Mol (mollyringle) wrote,

A "don't panic" reminder from the daughter of a nuclear engineer

For what it's worth, my dad, a nuclear engineer, sent this in email today. I'm not here to tell you that nuclear power is 100% safe and clean or anything like that, but I do hope to help you do what the Hitchhiker's Guide helpfully reminds you to do: namely, DON'T PANIC. For panic, there is no need. Here's my dad's message:


For more reliable info and status of Japan's nuclear plants, see:

1. Nuclear Energy Institute:
Click on the "information on the Japanese earthquake and reactors in that region"
This also gives links to other sites.

2. World Nuclear Association:
Also see their info sheets, such as 'nuclear power plants and earthquakes'

3. Japan Industrial Forum:
They give reports on the plant status of each plant.

Radiation measurements: 1 Sievert= 1 Sv= 100 rem, or 1 mSv = 100 mrem.

Normal background doses for a person in the US is around 500-600 mrem/year.(5-6 mSv/yr)

A dose of 40 rem (400 mSv) or less produces no detectable effects, such as increased cancer incidence.

Doses above 40 rem increase your cancer incident rate proportional to the dose. A dose of 100 rem increases your cancer incident rate by about 5%, and a dose of 200 rem increases the cancer incident rate by about 10%.

A dose of about 100 rem (1000 mSv or 1 Sv) would induce radiation sickness. Most people would recover from such a dose with treatment.

A dose of about 400-500 rem (4000-5000 mSv) would be lethal to about 50% of the people.

The Japanese plants do have a problem, but it is pretty localized to the plant site and to a lesser extent the area within about 10 miles of the plant. Any radiation reaching the US should be negligible and produce no effects. There's a lot of space and dilution between us and Japan, along with decay of the radioactive material.

Hopes this helps understand the situation.


Molly's addendum: Japan, you are strange and unique and beautiful, and I love you! I'm so sorry for all that has happened to you lately. I also applaud the infrastructure and engineering you had in place beforehand, which kept these disasters from being much, much worse. You'll pull through this just fine, because you're awesome that way. Much love, your buddies on the other edge of the Ring of Fire.


Update, added 3/17/11: I asked Dad what kind of dose readings we're actually seeing, there and here. His answer...

Reliable dose readings at and around the plants are hard to find. I don't think TEPCO (who operates the plants) is doing a very good job reporting these, nor is the regulatory group in Japan.

I've seen the following numbers:
150 mrem/hr at 20 km
3000 mrem between Units 2 and 3
40,000 mrem beside Unit 3, then later falling to 1190 mrem, then 60 mrem
10,000 mrem inside Unit 4
75 and 34 mrem/hr at the plant gates

Remember that the average person gets about 600 mrem/yr from background. So some of these are very high doses and one would not want to spend very long in that vicinity. That's why they are recommending evacuation around the plants.

What might we see here? Depends on how serious the accident becomes. We might see a slight increase in the background here--we might pick up a few extra mrem. But that's like the dose you'd get flying from Seattle to Chicago.

The trouble with radiation is that it's too easy to measure. You can measure very small amounts--like one atom disintegrating. Many airborne toxins aren't measurable until they reach concentrations of 5-10% of a lethal dose! If radiation were this way, we couldn't measure it until it reached 3000 mrem or so.

We will probably know more what to expect in a few days, but I wouldn't worry about a very large increase in the background dose.
Tags: science

  • Three random "weird tricks" that worked for me

    There's no way to write a subject line like that and not sound like a spam generator, is there? Nonetheless, here you go; three life-hack-ish…

  • My sci-fi, others' fantasy

    I seldom come up with science fiction ideas, but here's one that occurred to me lately while dealing with our flooded basement (puddles and rivulets,…

  • Nature: not all it's cracked up to be

    The other month we tried some Oreo knockoffs from a brand called Back to Nature. The name spawned many jokes: ah yes, nature, where chocolate…

  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.