?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

The Bechdel Test and my books

Novelist kateelliott first introduced me to the Bechdel Test in this post about epic fantasy. The Bechdel Test was originally created for movies, but can be applied easily to books too. As its official page states, the test rates a movie (or a book, we could say) on the following three criteria:

1) It has to have at least two women in it,
2) who talk to each other,
3) about something besides a man.

This test has stuck in my mind ever since reading Elliott's post, because, as she says, it's kind of astonishing how many books and movies don't pass all three criteria. I do believe in basic equality, and those three simple rules seem more than fair.

So naturally it made me look at my own novels. And I'm chagrined to say that some of them barely squeak by, or might even fail. Quick rundown:

The Ghost Downstairs: Passes with full marks. Lots of female characters--in fact, more females than males. They do discuss men (it's a romance, after all), but they also discuss ghosts and jobs and stuff.

Summer Term: Hmm. I do have a number of active female characters, but most of them don't interact with each other, or only meet briefly. The two best friends, Paige and Ky, do chat a lot, but it's almost always about men. Again, in my defense, it's a romance, and of the most frothy sort. Still, they take sidetracks into movies and academics for a line or two here and there, so maybe this book gets a pass.

What Scotland Taught Me: Passes just fine. Of the four main characters, three are young women, who do plenty of interacting. Again, squealing (or squabbling) over boys constitutes a lot of their subject matter, but there are soberer discussions involving family members and career plans and ghost legends.

Of Ghosts and Geeks: (Novella; likely soon to be published--yay!) Highly silly, given that one of the main female characters is an obnoxious ghost, but it does pass. She and the living female protagonist occasionally talk of non-romance issues, but not much, since the whole point is that the ghost is obsessed with romance.

Boy in Eyeliner: (Not yet published. In revision.) Eek. This might fail! But my defense this time is somewhat better. It's from a first-person male point of view, and his main love ends up being with another man. Hopefully that regains some of my gender-equality street cred. Also, I've scattered the characters across the globe--Portland, Seattle, and London--so the three or four important female characters simply aren't in the same location at the same time, on the whole. Still, maybe I should reconsider that.

So. How do your favorites--or your own creations--measure up?

Comments

teenybuffalo
Mar. 31st, 2011 04:22 am (UTC)
That is thoughtful of you. Thank you.

The heck of it is that lots of people have that association with the word "feminist". FWIW, I think this is also partly the fault of the press, because conflict sells newspapers and because it was fun to circulate the meme that "feminist"="that woman who mutilated her husband with a kitchen knife". In any case, it's certainly ingrained through the minds of a lot of people I know. I wish it wasn't but there it is.
mollyringle
Mar. 31st, 2011 03:18 pm (UTC)
I took out that part of the sentence just now. Really it added nothing to the post. :) I was sleep-deprived yesterday--mothering, the hardest feminine work of all! Yeah, the word "feminist" has almost acquired too much baggage for safe usage. I just want to be an "equalist" or something. That said, I recently read The Moon Under Her Feet by Clysta Kinstler, and religion-wise it has made me want the world to be all Goddessy again!